MAIN MENU

Europe will not be able to fight the return of conscription

The post-Cold War generation grew up with the blessings of peace – the freedom to travel and study, and never having to worry about their countries’ security. But that era is over.

Avatar photoby Oliver Hartwich

My response:

Read more: Europe will not be able to fight the return of conscription

A larger context is needed to analyse this, as below:

New Zealand does not need a military fighting force. What A/NZ needs is specialized disaster relief – much cheaper and more directed at the larger threats to our ecospheres and our people. Global nuclear forces are a great threat to A/NZ and the world’s security. There is no such thing as nuclear deterrence and there never has been; it’s just been a figment of a collective insanity.


NZ’s foreign policy shift adds to piling flashpoints

As the new Government moves New Zealand more clearly into the American camp, we risk further division as a country – and must challenge efforts to enmesh us in alliances against our interests.

Avatar photoby Rob Campbell

I pick only one point from Rob Campbell’s terrific statement to comment on – Jacinda Ardern (remember her?)

Read more: NZ’s foreign policy shift adds to piling flashpoints

‘while engaging in flirting – if not foreplay – with Nato in Europe.’

Up to now, since the Labour Party with Jacinda Ardern became the previous government, this country’s biggest problem has been that PM’s unthinking instinct to support NATO, a very aggressive militaristic organization. It was based on the PM’s understanding of ‘who we are’ as a people and our history. Remember that the PM’s response to the mosque massacre was ‘this is not who we are’. Fair enough assertion in that circumstance, though over the following weeks and months there was much welcome discussion about the colonialist nature of our history. But undoubtedly ‘who we are’ was fundamentally important to that PM. And when she realized that her understanding was incorrect, she resigned. So I think your description of ‘flirting, or ‘foreplay’, while clever and to a point insightful, is not personal enough to that PM to get at the best description.

Now we have a new government which has a better understanding of the shallow and dangerous nature of that understanding of our history because it reflects its own exploitation ideology. They instinctively understand that that philosophy will not be workable in the future so they know this is their last chance to implement it. And, of course, it is global, not just here and not just in the person of Donald Trump. This leaves a civilization, aware of the need to fundamentally change, rudderless and with weapons available to end it all.

This clear view reveals that it would not be unrealistic to call this a global suicide pact. There is no such thing as ‘nuclear deterrence’ and there never has been – it’s a figment of a collective insanity.


Letter to The Post replying to a letter describing the new government as not a typical ‘National’ government

The Editor, The Post, Wellington

07/04/ 2024

Dear Editor:

Radha Sahar and Charles Bagnall (Off the track, 5 Apr) suggest the new government is not a real ‘National’ government but one supporting the selfish agenda of the far-right. And at the end they say ‘middle-ground’ National voters should stand up and get the party ‘back on track.’

While hopeful, I don’t think they are characterizing ‘middle’ National voters properly.  Yes, this government is pushing far-right agendas.   They have formed the most angry, most desperate government this country has ever seen.  They know, as we all do, that this far-right agenda brings no prospect of a future ready to take on the existential challenges of climate change, nuclear weapons, and generally the global overshoot of our ecosystems by human civilization.

Actually, this triumvirate of parties has never tried to hide their anger and desperation against reality, bulldozing progress (“get NZ back on track”), and there is no reason to think that voters haven’t voted for that and haven’t got what they wanted.  This desperation is very shallow, certainly, and it may not last, but let’s call it what is right now for the sake of clarity and honesty.

Sincerely,

Richard Keller


From: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons: ICAN (93 signatories)

The second meeting of states parties has just concluded in New York, and has agreed that nuclear deterrence is a significant security problem for the world.  States parties agreed to work, along with the International Committee of the Red Cross and ICAN and other stakeholders and experts to “challenge the security paradigm based on nuclear deterrence by highlighting and promoting new scientific evidence about the humanitarian consequences and risks of nuclear weapons”.

Never before has a group of states agreed to work together on this issue.

Editor – There is no such thing as ‘nuclear deterrence’ and there never has been. For decades now that notion has been no more than a figment of a collective insanity.


Sam Sachdeva of Newsroom analyses New Zealand’s relationship today to the Ukraine war. I raise the question of the threat of nuclear war.

I add an additional line of perspective beyond what Sachdeva raises.

Read the rest of this entry »

Ron Mark again pushes the dangerous option

The Editor, The Sunday Star Times, Auckland

08/04/ 2022

Dear Editor:

It is no surprize that Ron Mark is recommending lethal aid for Ukraine.  

Read the rest of this entry »

A nuclear weapon speculative warning

From a recent Newsroom article from Monash U in Australia, discussing the changing reality of ‘nuclear deterrence’, this quote:

Read the rest of this entry »

Newsroom article on nuclear deterrence from Monash U is worth (more than) a read.

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/reliance-on-nuclear-deterrence-risks-nuclear-use-for-first-time-in-70-years


There is no new Cold War. From now on, only hot wars

The Editor, The Listener, Auckland

06/03/ 2022

Dear Editor:

There is no new Cold War.  The Cold War was a post WWII era of several decades which ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.  As such the nuclear arsenals in the world are redundant and outdated with their insane mutual assured destruction (MAD) and ‘nuclear deterrence’ which never actually existed except as a figment of a collective insanity in that previous time.

Read the rest of this entry »

AUKUS: nuclear powered ships or nuclear weapons?

The Editor, The Listener, Auckland

18/09/ 2021

Dear Editor:

Nuclear powered ships, or nuclear weapons?  The United States and allies’ false doctrine of security is based primarily on nuclear weapons. 

Read the rest of this entry »