MAIN MENU

NZ’s foreign policy shift adds to piling flashpoints

As the new Government moves New Zealand more clearly into the American camp, we risk further division as a country – and must challenge efforts to enmesh us in alliances against our interests.

Avatar photoby Rob Campbell

I pick only one point from Rob Campbell’s terrific statement to comment on – Jacinda Ardern (remember her?)

Read more: NZ’s foreign policy shift adds to piling flashpoints

‘while engaging in flirting – if not foreplay – with Nato in Europe.’

Up to now, since the Labour Party with Jacinda Ardern became the previous government, this country’s biggest problem has been that PM’s unthinking instinct to support NATO, a very aggressive militaristic organization. It was based on the PM’s understanding of ‘who we are’ as a people and our history. Remember that the PM’s response to the mosque massacre was ‘this is not who we are’. Fair enough assertion in that circumstance, though over the following weeks and months there was much welcome discussion about the colonialist nature of our history. But undoubtedly ‘who we are’ was fundamentally important to that PM. And when she realized that her understanding was incorrect, she resigned. So I think your description of ‘flirting, or ‘foreplay’, while clever and to a point insightful, is not personal enough to that PM to get at the best description.

Now we have a new government which has a better understanding of the shallow and dangerous nature of that understanding of our history because it reflects its own exploitation ideology. They instinctively understand that that philosophy will not be workable in the future so they know this is their last chance to implement it. And, of course, it is global, not just here and not just in the person of Donald Trump. This leaves a civilization, aware of the need to fundamentally change, rudderless and with weapons available to end it all.

This clear view reveals that it would not be unrealistic to call this a global suicide pact. There is no such thing as ‘nuclear deterrence’ and there never has been – it’s a figment of a collective insanity.


Rob Campbell on Newsroom examines the new government’s approach (‘know nothing’) to Fair Pay Agreements.

As usual, I try to enlighten the discussion by seeing things in a global historical / cultural focus.

Read more: Rob Campbell on Newsroom examines the new government’s approach (‘know nothing’) to Fair Pay Agreements.

‘The high-paid executives of business, government and their interest groups, many of whom will applaud the move, also do not experience what those who might benefit from “Fair Pay” agreements do.’

It’s important to see this in the longer and deeper terms of historical and cultural factors. These have always churned in the collective as questions of ‘who are we’. And now more than ever they are at play. Ove the last 40 years, the global economy has been focused mainly on widening the gap between rich and poor, that is growing inequality. This government is playing to this focus with a desperation which exposes their perceived lack of a need to justify. Why are they getting away with this, as is Trump in USA, so easily. It is important to try to understand this.

It’s now or never for these desperadoes as the climate crisis is illustrative of the need to curb exploitation as the applicable ideology in human affairs, falsely described as ‘human nature’. “Who were we”, “who are we”, “who must we become”.


Newsroom and Newshub examine the chaos for the next government and the country if Te Pati Seymour becomes influential in the next government.

From Newsroom, article from Emma Hatton about the potential difficulties in National trying to work with To Pati Seymour. My response:

Thanks, Garry Moore (former mayor of Christchurch). Looking at the Republican Party in the USA, Trump for President has resulted in many raised eyebrows here in A/NZ. How could they be so stupid? But now right winger McCarthy has been rolled from Speaker of the House by the same kind of rabbit hole faction as Te Pati Seymour. We shouldn’t be surprized that this desperation is alive here in A/NZ as well.

From Newshub, Luxon claims he will govern ‘for all New Zealanders’. My response:

Ardern disappeared after she said the same thing because her view of ‘who we are’ varied from the real ‘who we are’.  And this is not just New Zealand.  This is global because of denial (denial!) at the indications for fundamental change required by a changing climate. Luxon has a different view of ‘who we are’ from Ardern and the result of a National led government may be unprecedentedly confusing and desperate.


The old future is gone. Will it be the dead past? The surreal present?

From The Land Institute (Kansas) comes the notion that “The old future is gone”. I agree. Felicity Johnson in the Dom Post is wary of Wayne Brown being one of those ‘deeply tiring’, but dangerous, “Office Rambos”. As usual I take a longer view in my reply to the DomPost.

Read the rest of this entry »

‘Your pre-COP climate denial inoculation’ – David Williams on Newsroom

Here is my usual addition to this description noting the importance of the ‘collective sub conscious’ in this ongoing process.

Read the rest of this entry »

Kevin Trenberth is flummoxed by the USA Supreme Court’s decision saying the EPA cannot regulate carbon emissions.

This is a ‘Reply’ I have added to Newsroom’s published article by Kevin Trenberth of U of Auckland.

Read the rest of this entry »

George Monbiot is at it again reminding us of the real world we try to ignore.

My response to Rod Oram’s comments on George Monbiot’s new essay on diet.

Read the rest of this entry »

How ‘main stream’ is far-right ideology in the USA?

                                                                   September 14, 2021

The Editor, The Progressive Magazine

Madison, Wisconsin, USA   

Hello The Progressive,

The look at far right groups in your April / May print edition is informative and interesting.  But it only hints at the discussion as to whether and how much of their message has made it into the main stream. 

Read the rest of this entry »

Cancel Culture – letter to Listener

The Editor, The Listener, Auckland

22/02/2021

Dear Editor:

Today’s accusations of ‘cancel culture’ are over the top.  The original cancel culture was the desperate ‘political correctness’ movement in the States in the Seventies / Eighties, even carrying through to today (‘woke’). Read the rest of this entry »


‘Cancel culture’ term a desperate misuse

The Editor, The Sunday Star Times, Auckland

16/02/2021

Dear Editor:

Today’s accusations of ‘cancel culture’ are over the top.  The original cancel culture was the desperate ‘political correctness’ movement in the States in the Seventies / Eighties, even carrying through to today (‘woke’). Read the rest of this entry »